Forty percent of Washington, DC households have just one occupant.

Being single still doesn’t make sleeping with poets a good idea, though.

The ultimate in public art.

The Founding Fathers did not view post office as something to be run like a business, but as an essential vehicle of democracy and a civic good.

Bike snobs and coffee snobs unite for hipster superpowers (actually, I think is a great idea and would love to visit this place).

But that old standby, the 9 cent cup o’ coffee, is gone (but it’s only going up to 45 cents, which, while a huge increase in percentage terms, is not really so bad in the greater scheme of things).

It’s about freaking time.

Apparently, the new explanation hinges less on super awesome, faster than light particles and more on faulty wiring.

On the other hand, while I was unable to replicate the original experiment, I am pretty confident of my ability to replicate bad wiring.

This was one of the issues that I worked on while I was a congressional staffer, so I will affirm what the author says – the United States Postal Service is not broke.

So if Amazon starts opening brick and mortar stores, do I still hate them? Answer: not so much, provided they pack the store full of books.

The Oxford University Press in India.

The probably with Davos is that they just don’t get it.

The second novel is Marque and Reprisal and it suffers a bit by being in the middle of the series, as one of the connecting novels, if you will. The author is moving us along to the real meat of things, but without the newness and character building of the first novel.

Kylara ‘Ky’ Vatta also seems to be pushed along in her development a little faster than seems natural and her preternatural skills at tactics and combat seem to be coming along faster than I can completely accept.

And sometimes money seems to be problem for Ky and her spaceship and then sometimes she seems to be able to afford an awful lot of stuff.

But, that won’t be a deterrent to reading the next book. It’s a fast paced bit of military science fiction and it’s got me sufficiently hooked. I’m eager to find out what happens when Ky starts using her letter of marque authorizing her to operate as a privateer on behalf of the interests of her homeworld, the improbably named Slotter Key (which confused me a bit in the first book – I had trouble catching on this was the name of an entire planet and not just a picturesque island on a planet, but maybe that’s the Floridian in me; I hear a place called ‘key’ and I think ‘Key West’ or ‘Key Largo,’ not ‘Earth’ nor ‘Mars’)

Look, it’s genre fiction. No one expects it to be Thomas Pynchon or Leo Tolstoy. We expect it to be Isaac Asimov with more explosions.

Read and enjoy.

Contemporary Marxist theory.

Poetry, immigration, and refugees.

If you need to buy some anarchist postcards, this is the place.

I talked about tragedy before, but I want to highlight this remark he makes:

Tragedy is excluded as a Christian category and is replaced by a theology of sin that focuses on personal guilt, divine punishment, and substitutionary atonement. A radically liberal theology must find a way to affirm both tragedy and redemption. [page 52]

Later he writes:

If there is a divine comedy, it is a tragicomedy, a story of a crucified God who undergoes the suffering and conflicts that render historical existence tragic. To affirm tragic suffering in God is a deep revision of the classical metaphysics, which exempts God from the pathos of world. [page 52]

There is also what he writes about the relationship between Christianity, Christ and, culture – written within the larger context of what should be the relationship. The larger relationship includes questions such as, should Christianity (and this could apply to any religion) be above culture, be something beyond mere human affairs as befits something so intimately connected to the divine. Or, does it have an obligation to culture, to guide it down a path that will lead humanity to its salvation? And if so, should religion dominate culture, become inextricably intertwined in culture? Or something more subtle? This question seems particularly relevant as Rick Santorum takes a lead in national GOP polls. He clearly sees culture as something which should be forcefully dominated by religion by the force of law. This is very different from the more liberal view of religious interaction with culture exemplified by civil rights movements that use the moral authority of the church to give support to larger ideas of justice.

He actually comes up with five different paths:

Christ against culture – wherein belief in Christ is assumed to against culture.
Christ of culture – wherein Jesus is a ‘great hero of human cultural history,’ the creator of the values of Western civilization.
Christ above culture – ‘views Christ as the fulfillment of cultural aspirations and the restorer of the institutions of true society.’
Christ and culture in paradox – a complex one, but one that respects both the dictates of human culture (such as government and laws) and Christ while accepting the contradictions; though never explicitly said, the Christ’s remark about giving unto Caesar seems relevant here.
Christ the transformer of culture – is described as creative, with culture as a ‘perverted good’ (as opposed to an inherent evil) that can be transformed and redeemed.

Later, the author presents a new (to me) view of God’s interaction with the world, taken from a reading of Hegel (I told you, he loves Hegel), writing that ‘if God interacts with the world, God must take on the diversity of the world, just as the world takes on the oneness of God – a oneness that is not sameness but a perpetual play of many, unified in love.’ This brings to mind things like Liebniz’ monads or ancient Greek conceptions of the world as oneness, ideas which I never properly saw as at all compelling before, but I also never tried hard to understand how to resolve the contradictions before and this seems to give one way of doing so.

He writes of how Christ transformed the old view in a way particularly relevant to feminist theory:

He transformed the patriarchal concept of divine fatherhood into a maternal or nurturing concept of God. [page 74]

Another quote that struck me:

God acts redemptively in relation to nature both directly, as cosmic eros, and indirectly through human beings.

His writing about Spirit leads me to think of certain agnostic visions of God (such as God as being the sum of physical laws, which was, I believe Einstein’s view):

…Spirit introduces a principle of universality, the wholeness from which the spirit proceeds as God returns to godself from creating, indwelling and redeeming the world. The Spirit proceeds not just from Christ but from the whole world, from a diversity of religious figures and traditions as well as from diverse natural powers.

The author makes a connection between Buddhist ideas of detachment from the world (though he also admits that his understanding of Buddhism is limited) and the concept of Grace. The emptiness and letting go implied by what one might call the Buddhist theory of redemption correlates to the letting go implied by Grace. Each involves a certain detachment from the physical world as one touches an aspect of the divine.

Okay. I’ve rambled enough. I just felt I gave the whole thing short shrift the first time and thought I’d try and rectify that.

Go back about your business.

According to Edge.org, Edge.org is the smartest website out there.

Handy dandy tool for finding independent alternatives to Starbucks and the like.

Was Sigmund Freud the last flowering of the Enlightenment rather than an early flowering of Modernism?

From a business point of view, it seems like an absolutely insane decision to spend a rumored $200 million on it. Is there that much pent up demand for early twentieth century planetary romances?

I’ve been reading a decent bit of Edgar Rice Burroughs lately. Not the Tarzan stories. But his hollow earth stories and his Mars novels – I’m all about those.

So, I read this first book (upon which, presumably, the movie is based) A Princess of Mars and am halfway through its sequel, Gods of Mars.

As noted, they are considered, genre-wise, as planetary romances. Essentially, they are science fiction novels that are a little loosey goosey with the science and big on finding excuses for strapping men and hideous monsters to fight with swords for the honor of scantily clad women. So really, it’s just begging to have a movie based on it.

Last year, Inkwood Books celebrated its twentieth anniversary.

And it was cool.